Thanks for your questions, Betsy.

Did you ever regret aligning yourself with people of such high caliber who arguably dominated the game? Do you think people perceive you as weak simply because of the people you were tied to? Is it fair to say that they were making more/bigger moves?

Honestly, no, I never regretted aligning myself with them. For one, I don't think I'm a weak player by any means. Sure I wasn't as bold and out there with the decisions and moves that I made, but that doesn't make me weak. On top of that, being aligned with someone who is seen as making the big moves and getting all of the blood on their hands is never a bad thing, because their name always comes up before yours in a vote. Also, I truly value the relationships I have now with Charlie, J'Tia, and Eddie and I wouldn't have those had we not had that alliance at the beginning. So, no, I have never once regretted aligning myself with those 3. Not, at least, until I had to turn on Eddie and vote for him.

Additionally, I think people can say what they want as far as "big move" go. I've said it once and I'll say it again, big moves do not win the game of Survivor. Sure they are fun and flashy and make the game exciting, but a big move does not always constitute a win, as far a I am concerned. Furthermore, running through the game quickly in my head, I don't recall any of them making extraordinarily successful big moves. Sure, they all played smart, they all had good strategies, and they're all great competitors, but I don't remember any of them shaking things up too much or formulating any major blindsides. So, no, I don't think it's fair for people to consider me weak in comparison or for people to say they made bigger moves than I did.

Why did you decide to never do that? What would you say to jurors who think you played a little bit too passively?

I decided to never to stir things up too much because it never truly benefited my game. If you're going to make a big move, you have to think of the aftermath, and you have to think of what your game will be like moving forward from there. Take for instance your attempted J'Tia takedown. Had I gone along with your plan and stirred the pot and made a big move at that stage, Ken, Kelly, and Charlie, all strong players and all people who trusted me and whom I trusted, would have lost full trust in me and they would have been after me. On the flip side, I would have gained an ally in you, Yul, JR, and Bill, all of which I had less of a connection with besides you. The pros of voting out J'Tia at that stage were FAR outweighed by the cons, and as you know, I had another agenda for that round anyways. But, all of that to say, for those who think I played a passive game, don't forget that one big move doesn't win you the game, but you have to be cognizant of the aftermath, which is FAR more important than any big move you can make in this game.

Using the numbers 1-13 rank the social games of the people in the final 3 and all of the jurors in order of whose social game was the strongest (1) to whose was the weakest (13).

1. Ken
2. Betsy
3. Jonathan
4. J'Tia
5. Kelly
6. Charlie
7. Eddie
8. Marisa
9. Hayden
10. Yul
11. Bill
12. Peter
13. JR

Do you have any further proof that you actually were consciously planning to turn people against me? Can you explain to me in detail the conversations you had with people that did just that or any information from your confessional immediately after the majority rules challenge that prove you were actually going after me? If you really did mean to do that all along, why did you admit to me on multiple occasions that you hadn't made big moves yet? Prove to me that you're not just changing your story to make yourself look better after a chaotic round and tribal council.

If Screenshots were allowed that would make this so much easier. First of all, J'Tia never went off on me and scared me into voting with her. I never intended on voting against J'Tia, and I told her that.

This is an exact quote from me during that round in a conversation between J'Tia and I:

"JR and Betsy are voting you. The only reason they're voting you is because they think they have majority with my vote. I'm voting Bill. When the votes come out, JR and Betsy look like they betrayed our alliance of 6, making them targets over us."

If I didn't seem paranoid, you wouldn't have believed me. And I, honestly, was a little paranoid, because if things didn't go the way I needed them to that round, I could have been found out and taken down. Yes, I had approached you about Ken, because it was safer for me to try to convince you to vote Ken then J'Tia. It wouldn't have made any sense for me to come to you targeting my closest ally. When you flipped the vote on J'Tia, and then blamed Ken/Kelly, it made my life even easier. I instantly told Ken and Kelly that you said they were trying to get the vote onto J'Tia, aiding in my ability in getting them to distrust you, which, again, could be proven if screenshots were allowed. But I sent Kelly chat transcripts of you telling me that her and Ken had instigated the J'Tia vote, etc.

I also found this quote from me in a chat log with Kelly:

"i shouldn't have tried to rock the boat last week and expose betsy. i shoulda just kept it simple"

I kept telling you that I hadn't made any big moves yet for a couple of reasons. One, I hadn't really deemed any move I had made up to that point "big". My moves at the time had included instigating the alliance between me, Eddie, Charlie, and J'Tia and then making sure I had trust and support from Kelly and Ken and hinting at/starting to instigate our 6 person alliance. Secondly, if you make a move at all in this game, there's no sense in waving it in someone's face. Truthfully, it's oftentimes better to be seen as more passive during the game so you're not a target at any of the votes. Of course, that makes this stage of the game a little more difficult, but it got less blood on my hands during the game.

Anyways, I could continue to search through my AIM chat logs for proof that bringing you down was the sole intention of that round for me, but at this point I think I've harped on it and proven it enough. I hope you believe me, but there's only so much I can do without screenshots.

Name each juror one by one and explain why they aren't in the finals right now and how/what they could have done better.

Kelly - I have to agree with Yul on this one. Kelly going after Charlie in the F5 is the biggest reason she isn't sitting here right now. Had she stuck with our Final 4 deal, Ken would have likely been the biggest target at F4, and the Final 3 would have been Charlie, myself, and Kelly.

Ken - Ken's not sitting here in the Final Three because he was a huge threat. He likely would have beaten almost anyone sitting here in the finals. I think it's hard to actually "do" anything to prevent something like that from happening, but Ken could have maybe played a little subtler throughout the game, alleviating the target on his back.

Jean-Robert - I think Jean-Robert acted too little too late, and that's why he sits on the jury. He approached me at Final 6 with a plan, but a plan that would have easily fallen through. I think had he approached folks sooner with a better argument, he might could have swayed people to keep him. Truthfully, I think J'Tia's idol round is ultimately what ended both Betsy and JR on the jury. I feel you both could have been more active in swaying people, rather than sitting idly by waiting on J'tia to get idoled out.

Betsy - I think part of what I just discussed of JR's downfall was also your downfall. Additionally, your desire to make a big move and shake things up turned people against you. I think you tried to make a big move too soon, and had you waited, it might have been more successful.

J'Tia - I think J'Tia is on the jury because, for one, she was definitely a threat in the game. Additionally, J'Tia was very blunt and honest with her feelings, which I think led to her being idoled out and targeted by Betsy. Perhaps surpressing those feelings could have assisted in that.

Bill - For me, the next three are all pretty similar. They're cross-tribal connections were all too well known, and I think it came to bight them in the ass at the end. I think they could have been more subtle about it so people wouldn't have caught on to their relationship so quickly.

Eddie - See Above

Marisa - See Above

Hayden - I always thought Hayden was so hesitant to talk strategy or make any kind of alliance, and come merge I think that was his downfall. Eddie, J'Tia, and I had all worked to make sure that we had relationships with Sebous, and I think Hayden fell short there, which caused him to be an early Dadès boot in the merge.

Peter - Truthfully I think the only thing that could have saved Peter was to fight harder in those tribal immunity challenge. He survived for as long as we could on the Rejects tribe, but I think JR and Betsy were too tight to keep him around that last round.

Again, thanks for you questions Betsy, and I hope this cleared some things up for you. Best of luck wit your decision