The way I see it, the less people might hurt us if we think of it in terms of strength in numbers, but on the contrary, the less people, the less chances we have of people getting into petty fights.

We also won't have to worry about missing a few hours and coming back to 50 pages of threads or meaningless banter to plod through. And we're also united by the fact that we were mostly all thought to be expendable so there's that ;)

My theory is I was 3rd overall and thus made the third leader for you guys.

That might be a little optimistic though. Maybe I was 31st. (: I have no clue what factored into Watt's getting my suit. All I know is something had to happen because I asked and Mission Control said that the mechanics at play were already in motion and that's why I'm here.

Izza @ 30/4/2015 14:18

My theory is I was 3rd overall and thus made the third leader for you guys.

I think that is what happened as well, because there really is, or was no guarantee the "bottom 9" would even be very talkative if at all if all grouped together, but with the right leader maybe things could have turned around, and I quite like this small group. Big groups are always breeding grounds for hatred and dissension amongst a group.

Small groups are good. Why do we think the others know of a bomb?

Misty @ 30/4/2015 14:35

Small groups are good. Why do we think the others know of a bomb?

They probably don't know about it.

Good. Better to BOOM them with.

(Anyway, bye everyone! I've got to go to work but I'll probably be around after 9 before phase change. Then I'll get off right after the phase goes down, I think.)


Has anyone exited yet?

I haven't. I'd bet Izzy was third and watts was likely last (or top of the bottom 9?). Regardless, I need to do some more reading on everything when I have time later.

I'd also bet the other group is split up in some way as well. They also have guns. Definitely more chaos over there.

I would also wager Izzy was third. I am going to exit now. Very excited to move forward with this group!

Izza @ 30/4/2015 15:18

My theory is I was 3rd overall and thus made the third leader for you guys.

basically what i was thinking. they took the 3rd highest score and swapped them with the lowest score to ensure the group left behind had a quality player. im more interested in how the 2 leaders had there groups created. did they have a draft or was it preselected? a draft would have created a new set of bottom rung players.

I would assume a draft would be much too time consuming if they were asked to pick back and forth, and if they are already in groups like us and on their separate paths (if that's the case) then it was probably something like 4th on the list went with 1, 5th with 2, 6th with 1, etc. Of course, that's if they've already been put in groups. They very well could have been asked to decide amongst themselves who goes with who/could be deliberating that right now, which is sure causing some issues potentially with such a large group.

Izza @ 30/4/2015 12:29

In other news we have a global win condition too. But I'm thinking our group win condition might be more viable at the moment. If our numbers dwindle too low and we don't find the bomb fast enough we can figure out what to do then.

Agree, we must work on team conditions. The others left us for dead. We could help if it's in sync with our group goal

I have submitted my action to go through the NE door.

##follow: Clifford